A specific idea to build and test, not a ready-made template. Starting opens an editable prompt; it does not begin a paid generation.
The useful part
What someone would do.
Enter the rubric and draft
Request criterion-by-criterion feedback
Review suggestions beside the original
The capabilities behind it
Why Div-idy fits this idea.
Div-idy provides building blocks for this project rather than a separate prebuilt integration for every use case. Here is the role each capability would play.
AI text and reference context
Div-idy connects supported projects to AI text generation and AI Context. Supplied reference information and instructions can guide an assistant's answers, drafts, explanations, or comparisons without exposing a provider API key in the page.
For this project: Compare the supplied draft with the supplied rubric and ask for actionable feedback rather than a rewritten essay.
AI feedback is not a teacher's grade, a plagiarism check, or a guarantee that every claim is correct.
Test the full workflow with your own information, including empty inputs, mistakes, mobile controls, and any published behavior. These concepts have not been individually built or verified.
Capability limits for this idea
AI text and reference context: AI features use the owner's AI-tool allowance separately from building the project. Context is reference material, not model training or an automatic connection to private systems; outputs can be wrong.
Use it where it belongs
Keep it personal, or share it deliberately.
When you are ready, publish the pages visitors should see. Share the unlisted live link, embed a published page on a compatible website, or connect a supported www address or subdomain where domain connections are enabled. Anyone with a published link can open it.
Build a teacher-rubric essay feedback for a student reviewing a draft against a supplied rubric.
Goal: Identify missing requirements and revision opportunities without automatically replacing the student's writing.
The main flow should let a person:
1. Enter the rubric and draft.
2. Request criterion-by-criterion feedback.
3. Review suggestions beside the original.
Details I will supply or customize:
- Rubric wording
- Feedback boundaries
- Personal information to remove before submission
Use these supported Div-idy capabilities:
- AI text and reference context: Compare the supplied draft with the supplied rubric and ask for actionable feedback rather than a rewritten essay. Use the built-in AI tool and relevant AI Context. Start requests only after an intentional user action, show loading and error states, and let the user review the answer. Do not invent an external API connection.
Important boundary: AI feedback is not a teacher's grade, a plagiarism check, or a guarantee that every claim is correct.
Make the layout work on desktop and mobile, with clear labels, keyboard-friendly controls, and useful empty, loading, and error states. Use clearly labeled sample information until I supply real content. Do not invent integrations, secure visitor logins, payments, or capabilities that are not available. Keep the first version focused on this main flow.